By Jody Godoy and Hyunjoo Jin

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -A U.S. jury on Friday discovered Tesla (NASDAQ:) Inc CEO Elon Musk and his firm weren’t responsible for deceptive buyers when Musk tweeted in 2018 that he had “funding secured” to take the electrical automotive firm personal.

Plaintiffs had claimed billions in damages and the choice additionally had been seen as essential for Musk himself, who typically takes to Twitter to air his views.

The jury got here again with a unanimous verdict roughly two hours after starting deliberations.

Musk was not current in court docket when the decision was learn however quickly tweeted that he was “deeply appreciative” of the jury’s resolution.

“Thank goodness, the knowledge of the individuals has prevailed,” he mentioned.

Nicholas Porritt, a lawyer for the buyers, mentioned in a press release, “We’re upset with the decision and are contemplating subsequent steps.”

Shares of Tesla rose 1.6% in after-hours buying and selling following the decision.

“A darkish chapter is now closed for Musk and Tesla,” Wedbush analyst Dan Ives mentioned. Ives added that some Tesla buyers feared Musk may need to promote extra Tesla inventory if he misplaced.

The world’s second-richest particular person has beforehand created authorized and regulatory complications by way of his typically impulsive use of Twitter, the social media firm he purchased for $44 billion in October.

Minor Myers, who teaches company legislation on the College of Connecticut and who had beforehand known as the buyers’ case robust, known as the end result “astounding.”

The U.S. anti-securities fraud legislation “has all the time been regarded as this nice bulwark towards misstatements and falsehoods,” he mentioned. “This end result makes you marvel whether it is as much as the job in fashionable markets,” he mentioned, including that Musk himself was prone to “double down” on his communication ways after the decision.

Musk’s consideration has been divided in latest months between Tesla, his rocket firm SpaceX and now Twitter. Tesla buyers have expressed considerations that working the social media firm has taken up an excessive amount of of his focus.

‘BAD WORD CHOICE’

Tesla shareholders claimed Musk misled them when he tweeted on Aug. 7, 2018, that he was contemplating taking the corporate personal at $420 per share, a premium of about 23% to the prior day’s shut, and had “funding secured.”

They are saying Musk lied when he tweeted later that day that “investor help is confirmed.”

The inventory value soared after the tweets after which fell once more after Aug. 17, 2018, because it grew to become clear the buyout wouldn’t occur.

Porritt throughout closing arguments mentioned the billionaire CEO just isn’t above the legislation, and must be held responsible for the tweets.

“This case in the end is about whether or not guidelines that apply to everybody else also needs to apply to Elon Musk,” he mentioned.

Musk’s lawyer Alex Spiro countered that Musk’s “funding secured” tweet was “technically inaccurate” however that buyers solely cared that Musk was contemplating a buyout.

“The entire case is constructed on unhealthy phrase selection,” he mentioned. “Who cares about unhealthy phrase selection?”

“Simply because it is a unhealthy tweet would not make it fraud,” Spiro mentioned throughout closing arguments.

An economist employed by the shareholders had calculated investor losses as excessive as $12 billion.

In the course of the three-week trial, Musk spent almost 9 hours on the witness stand, telling jurors he believed the tweets had been truthful. He mentioned he had lined up the required financing, together with a verbal dedication from Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund, the Public Funding Fund. The fund later backpedaled on its dedication, Musk mentioned.

Musk later testified that he believed he might have offered sufficient shares of his rocket firm SpaceX to fund a buyout, and “felt funding was secured” with SpaceX inventory alone.

Musk testified that he made the tweets in an effort to put small shareholders on the identical footing as massive buyers who knew concerning the deal. However he acknowledged he lacked formal commitments from the Saudi fund and different potential backers.

The decision is one other victory for Musk and his lawyer Spiro after they received a defamation lawsuit towards the billionaire in 2019 over his tweet calling a cave explorer a “pedo man”.