Tsai Ing-Wen, the chief of Taiwan, is slated to go to California and meet with US Home Speaker Kevin McCarthy in April.
This assembly will definitely forged an unpredictable variable on Sino-U.S. relations. The connection between China and the US is already frosty and was solely worsened by the stray balloon incident earlier this yr, and extra lately by elevated US sanctions in opposition to Chinese language corporations. US officers’ visits to Taiwan, beginning with final yr’s provocative journey by then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi, have ruffled feathers in Beijing, and a gathering between Tsai and McCarthy may definitely result in an unpredictable state of affairs.
Getting too cozy with the US will solely land Taiwan in additional hassle, given Washington’s historical past of screwing over its avowed companions. The US will fire up a conflict within the area by promising to help residents to the hilt after which abandoning them. This concept is nicely summarised in a satirical tweet by Washington, D.C. radio host and political analyst Garland Nixon, which blew as much as over half one million views and bought him denounced by the Taiwanese ‘International Ministry’.
BREAKING NEWS: White Home insiders leak that, when requested if there could possibly be any better catastrophe than the neocon Ukraine venture, President Biden responded, “wait till you see our plan for the destruction of Taiwan.”
— Garland Nixon (@GarlandNixon) February 15, 2023
“It is best to do what the folks of Europe didn’t do, and that’s you must look out on your personal pursuits. The Individuals are searching for his or her pursuits on the expense of others,” was Nixon’s recommendation for the residents of Taiwan once I spoke to him within the first episode of my new YouTube present The Supply.
“What the US Empire causes at the start, is instability. They’ve brought on instability in Ukraine at an existential stage. They’ve created dramatic instability within the EU. Have a look at the place the US has been for the final 25-30 years within the Conflict on Terror. The Center East – instability. So they will trigger dramatic instability in your island,” he continued.
“You could have a superpower proper subsequent door. In an effort to preserve stability, you’re going to must have a steady relationship with China [referring to the Chinese mainland]. The USA is 7,000 miles away. They may go away you, they may set you as much as be destroyed after which they’ll stroll away,” he concluded.
Nixon cited quite a few examples of Washington’s report on this precise situation. These embrace the US promising to help Kurdish forces in the event that they stood in opposition to Saddam Hussein within the Nineteen Nineties after which abandoning them to their destiny after they did simply that; abandoning people who labored with Washington through the conflict in Afghanistan; and the US serving to to destroy Syria and leaving a presence solely meant to steal the nation’s oil and deter Iranian affect, whereas ensuring to depart crippling sanctions in place.
This behavioral sample doesn’t merely apply to adversaries. It additionally applies to supposed allies. Nixon talked about that the EU economic system is within the gutter due to the bloc following US-dictated insurance policies over the Ukraine disaster. The EU can be slowly however certainly becoming a member of the US high-tech conflict on China, which is bound to break European corporations immensely.
In maybe the latest instance of Washington sticking it to its personal allies, the South China Morning Put up reported on March 10 that the US is upping its beef exports to China, benefiting from Australia instigating tensions with Beijing and shedding market share. So, because the West encourages Canberra to poke the dragon and lose a serious beef export vacation spot, Uncle Sam fills that gap by giving its corporations a brand new foothold.
“In spite of everything these commerce measures have been put up, the Individuals saved saying that they had our again, they have been standing agency with us however they’re promoting extra wine, extra beef,” Geoff Raby, a former Australian ambassador to China, advised the paper. “A lot for the loyal ally.”
Such a state of affairs will not be new. As I wrote in December 2021, the US exported 5.4 million tons of coal to China within the first half of 2021, in comparison with 531,000 tons for a similar interval a yr in the past – an absurdly excessive 920% year-on-year improve. In the identical interval in 2019, the US exported simply over 771,000 tons to China. This huge improve in American coal exports got here after Beijing imposed a digital ban on Australian coal after Canberra raised the ‘lab leak’ principle of COVID-19’s origin and decried ‘Chinese language aggression.’
In equity, China has tried to fix issues with Australia in latest months by strolling again its coal ban, plus the US drastically decreased its sale of coal to China within the yr 2022. However that also got here solely after being referred to as out by the Aussies over their hypocrisy and lack of imaginative and prescient.
So when Uncle Sam tells the Aussies to leap, Canberra asks, “How excessive?” They carry out their obligation, get punished by a overseas adversary and Washington leaves them within the ditch. It’s not a couple of grand technique or empire-building, it is about serving to American corporations make some bucks. That’s it. In our dialog, Nixon additionally put ahead the concept with the US transferring the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Firm (TSMC) to Arizona, they’d need the unique one destroyed.
You may take into account the US a dependable nation in the event you belief its report, Nixon stated, and that report exhibits that it’s going to screw everybody over to line its firms’ pockets – buddy or foe alike. It doesn’t matter. That’s simply how Washington behaves. So for anybody sitting in Taiwan, Australia, Europe or another place the place your authorities is following Washington’s tune with out protest: you higher watch it, or else.
The statements, views and opinions expressed on this column are solely these of the writer and don’t essentially characterize these of RT.