Since late January of 2012, the Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard has as soon as per week featured a “Mainstream Media Scream” choice in his “Washington Secrets and techniques” column. For every choose, normally posted on-line on Monday, I present an evidence and suggest a “scream” score (scale of 1 to 5).

This submit incorporates the “Liberal Media Screams” beginning in January 2023.

> For 2021 and 2022, for all of 2020. For all of 2019. For all of  2018. (Re-named “Liberal Media Scream” as of June 11, 2018.) “Mainstream Media Screams” for:

> July-December 2017 posts; January by way of June 2017; July to December 2016; for January to June 2016; for July to December 2015; for January to June 2015. (2012-2014 are featured on MRC.org: For 2014; for June 17, 2013 by way of the top of 2013. And for January 31, 2012 by way of June 11, 2013.)

Verify Bedard’s “Washington Secrets and techniques” weblog for the newest selection and his different Washington insider posts. Every week, this web page will likely be up to date with Bedard’s newest instance of the worst bias of the week.

(For extra of the worst liberal media bias, browse the Media Analysis Heart’s Notable Quotables with compilations of the newest outrageous, typically humorous, quotes within the liberal media.)

■ New on February 27: Liberal Media Scream: Hollywood says banning filming plastic bottles will save the world

See the posting on the Washington Examiner’s web site the place you may watch the video and skim Baker’s evaluation. Every week later, Bedard’s article will likely be posted right here.

■ February 20: Liberal Media Scream: The View hits ‘Ron DeSaster,’ would ‘ban the alphabet’

(Washington Examiner submit)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options the hosts of ABC’s The View and their escalating screeching about Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) and his efforts to have public faculty classes conform with state regulation and what Sunshine State dad and mom need.

As an alternative of a level-headed dialogue about his efforts, the hosts attacked DeSantis as a right-wing social warrior who liberal Republican and never-Trumper Ana Navarro dubbed “Ron DeSaster.” The name-calling included unhinged expenses that the governor is so anti-education that he would “ban the alphabet.”

The ranting adopted strikes by DeSantis to query a brand new Faculty Board Superior Placement class on black historical past. He and another governors are involved the liberal class plan teaches essential race concept and different classes banned within the state.

“I believe he’s going to ban the alphabet. Holy hell,” stated Navarro.

From ABC’s The View on Thursday, Feb. 16:

ANA NAVARRO: What that is all about getting on Fox Information. What that is all about is fanning the flames of grievance, of white grievance. What that is all about is manufacturing tradition wars that don’t exist in order that he can come out like William Wallace, the man in Braveheart — “Freedom!” Hear, I dwell in Florida. I dwell underneath Gov. Ron DeSaster!

SUNNY HOSTIN: You bought to maneuver, Ana.

NAVARRO: Daily, I get up and surprise what he’s going to be. What’s the flavour du jour at this time? What’s he going to be in opposition to at this time? He’s in opposition to AP He’s in opposition to DEI — variety, fairness, and inclusion. He’s in opposition to [environmental, social, and governance] this week. He’s in opposition to electrical stoves.

HOSTIN: Don’t say homosexual.

NAVARRO: He’s in opposition to LGBTQ. I believe he’s going to ban the alphabet. Holy hell.

JOY BEHAR: These folks, these fascists on the market like DeSantis, they assume that we’re simply going to sit down again and allow them to do no matter they need. No, we’re not. We’ve seen this film earlier than. OK? These of us who lived within the ’60s and ’70s, we noticed this film. There have been many, many fascist techniques coming down the pike from Nixon and the remainder of these fascists; that’s what they’re. And we protested and we protested, and we ended a conflict that was unlawful. And we did stuff. And it’s taking place once more. That’s the excellent news.

Brent Baker, vp of analysis and publications for the Media Analysis Heart, explains our weekly choose: “The unhinged response to Ron DeSantis says one thing about who the left is most afraid of working for president. The celebrities of The View can’t have an trustworthy dialogue about his insurance policies and concepts, in order that they rant and rave and name him a ‘fascist’ and make different ridiculous accusations. It could entertain liberal viewers, but it surely needs to be embarrassing to ABC Information, which produces the every day gabfest.”

Score: FIVE out of FIVE SCREAMS.

■ February 13: Liberal Media Scream: Stephanopoulos calls for GOP examine Trump household

(Washington Examiner submit)

Armed solely with a Washington Put up story about Saudi hyperlinks to Kushner and Trump, Stephanopoulos requested Rep. James Comer (R-KY), chairman of the panel, “Will you be investigating that as properly?”

Comer known as for strict ethics disclosure legal guidelines, which Democrats have resisted, however that wasn’t ok for the media star and former Clinton White Home aide. “To be clear,” he stated, “you imagine that this could apply to Kushner and Trump in addition to the Bidens at this level?”

The change on Sunday’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos on ABC:

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Let me ask you extra about your oversight tasks. You made it clear you’re going to be Hunter Biden and his monetary entanglements with international international locations together with China. I wish to put up a front-page story from the Washington Put up this morning detailing Jared Kushner’s ties to the Saudis. “After serving to the prince’s rise, Trump and Kushner profit from Saudi funds.” A $2 billion funding in Kushner’s funds from the Saudis. We all know the president, former President Trump, has additionally acquired funds associated to the Saudi golf tour. Sen. Ron Wyden says these entanglements deserve investigation. Will you be investigating that as properly?

REP. JAMES COMER: I believe every little thing’s on the desk. Look, we’re investigating Joe Biden. We all know that Joe Biden stated through the presidential marketing campaign that he had no data of his son’s enterprise pursuits. He wasn’t concerned. He didn’t profit from them. We have now proof that might recommend in any other case, and that is very regarding. …

The Democrats complained about Kushner’s international dealings. Republicans are actually complaining about the complete Biden household’s international enterprise dealings. We have to know what’s allowable and what isn’t allowable. We have to have strict ethics legal guidelines, and we have to considerably improve the disclosure legal guidelines in America. So I believe this investigation goes to be crucial to repair an issue earlier than it will get out of hand.

STEPHANOPOULOS: However to be clear, you imagine that this could apply to Kushner and Trump in addition to the Bidens at this level?

COMER: I imagine that once we speak about passing laws to set a line as to the place you could be with relations of high-ranking authorities officers with respect to doing enterprise with adversaries abroad, then it could apply to everybody. We have to repair this earlier than it will get worse within the subsequent administration.

Brent Baker, vp of analysis and publications for the Media Analysis Heart, explains our weekly choose: “If solely the Washington press corps had been as keen over time to leap on tales about Hunter and Joe Biden getting cash out of China as they’ve persistently been to advertise each new allegation in opposition to anybody in Donald Trump’s orbit. It’s nearly as if Stephanopoulos is attempting to deflect from Joe Biden, to use his personal model of ‘both-siderism’ to undermine the influence of Congressman Comer’s upcoming hearings on the Bidens.”

Score: THREE out of FIVE SCREAMS.

■ February 6: Liberal Media Scream: Reporters beg for Biden to get ‘credit score’

(Washington Examiner submit)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream exhibits how determined some within the media are for President Joe Biden to get “credit score” for his efforts at a time when polls present that 62% don’t imagine the Democrat has achieved a lot.

The highest cheerleader is NBC reporter Andrea Mitchell who stated on Meet the Press that the president isn’t getting the thanks he deserves.

“He’s not getting credit score for the financial system, and needs to be,” she instructed host Chuck Todd.

From Sunday’s Meet the Press on NBC:

ANDREA MITCHELL: And he’s not getting credit score for the financial system, and needs to be. Have a look at it, you already know, I believe the hazard of recession is receding. It’s not altogether gone. We see an enormous jobs market. It’s an issue for Jay Powell [chairman of the Federal Reserve] as a result of now they do need to maintain tightening. However, you already know, wage progress is moderating.

CHUCK TODD: I let you know, folks don’t–

MITCHELL: Layoffs are solely in a couple of sectors, they’re not common.

TODD: There is not any doubt–

AMY WALTER: Manufacturing is constructing.

TODD: –however folks nonetheless really feel like this financial system’s simply not–

MITCHELL: That’s proper, as a result of inflation’s secure.

TODD: It nonetheless feels wobbly.

CORNELL BELCHER: Mid-summer, mid-summer – let’s, let’s test in on that.

TODD: That’s truthful.

Brent Baker, vp of analysis and publications for the Media Analysis Heart, explains our weekly choose: “How good it have to be to be a Democratic president so you could have main members of the Washington press corps spinning speaking factors in your favor, days earlier than your huge speech, about the way you ‘needs to be’ getting extra credit score. Mitchell’s contentions about Biden’s document are higher suited to somebody from the White Home press workplace than somebody who is meant to be a dispassionate journalist.”

Score: THREE out of FIVE SCREAMS.

■ January 30: Liberal Media Scream: Hammer time: Speaker McCarthy kilos media bias and double requirements

(Washington Examiner submit)

Final week, for instance, when a reporter didn’t like McCarthy’s reply to a query, the speaker stated: “Let me be very clear and respectful to you. You requested me a query. Once I reply it, it is the reply to your query. You aren’t getting to find out whether or not I reply your query or not, OK?”

Then, on Face the Nation, he bristled when host Margaret Brennan criticized his appointment of “election deniers” to committee posts. Noting that she didn’t complain when Democratic deniers of former President Donald Trump’s election bought good committee seats, he stated, “If you wish to maintain Republicans to that equation, why don’t you additionally maintain Democrats?”

From Sunday’s interview on CBS’s Face the Nation:

Margaret Brennan: I wish to ask you about a few of the make-up of your caucus.

Speaker Kevin McCarthy: Sure.

Brennan: In keeping with CBS data, 70% of the Home GOP members denied the outcomes of the 2020 election. You set a lot of them on very key committees: Intelligence, Homeland Safety, Oversight. Why are you elevating people who find themselves denying actuality like that?

McCarthy: Effectively, if you happen to look to the Democrats, their rating member [Jamie] Raskin had the identical factor, denied Trump or Bush was in there. Bennie Thompson —

Brennan: Did you see these numbers we simply put up there? Seventy %!

McCarthy: Did you even be truthful and equal the place you checked out Raskin did the identical factor, Bennie Thompson, whose a rating member and was a chair? These people had been chair of the Democratic Occasion.

Brennan: I’m asking you, as chief of Kevin McCarthy’s Home, why you made these decisions? These had been your decisions.

McCarthy: Yeah, they’re my decisions, however they’re the convention decisions. However I’m additionally asking you if you look to see simply Republicans — Democrats have carried out the identical factor. So possibly it’s not denying. Perhaps it’s the one alternative they need to have a query about what went on through the election. So if you wish to maintain Republicans to that equation, why don’t you additionally maintain Democrats? Why don’t you maintain Jamie Raskin? Why don’t you maintain Bennie Thompson? When Democrats had appointed them to be chair, I by no means as soon as heard you ask Nancy Pelosi or any Democrat that query once they had been in energy, within the majority. Once they questioned —

Brennan: You’re speaking about issues going again to 2000, which was a time, I didn’t have this present again then, which is why I’m asking you now about your management.

McCarthy: No, no! They had been in energy final Congress. So why —

Brennan: You’re speaking about questions from the 2000 election.

McCarthy: You’re asking me about questions that occurred to a different Congress.

Brennan: About these decisions you simply made, simply made. That is your Congress.

McCarthy: These are members who simply bought elected by their constituents, and we put them into committees. And I’m proud to do it.

Brent Baker, the vp of analysis and publications for the Media Analysis Heart, explains our weekly choose: “It’s at all times refreshing to see a politician push again in opposition to a liberal media storyline the journalist presumes is past questioning, particularly when the journalist is somebody so oblivious as Brennan is to her bias.”

Score: FIVE out of FIVE SCREAMS (CHEERS).

■ January 23: Liberal Media Scream: MSNBC’s Pleasure Reid says DeSantis likes solely ‘completely satisfied slaves’

(Washington Examiner submit)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream highlights the newest cable TV assault on Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’s conflict on woke insurance policies in what’s more likely to develop into a daily media sample as the highest Republican rival of former President Donald Trump steps nearer to a 2024 bid.

The assault got here from MSNBC’s Pleasure Reid, enraged that DeSantis scuttled a pilot AP black course in state faculties. Nevertheless it’s not that easy, regardless of her spin.

In keeping with the DeSantis administration, the brand new course provided by Faculty Board violates Florida’s new anti-“woke” regulation as a result of it’s favorable to essential race concept.

“As submitted, the course is a automobile for a political agenda and leaves giant, ambiguous gaps that may be stuffed with further ideological materials, which we is not going to permit,” stated Bryan Griffin, the governor’s press secretary. “As Governor DeSantis has said, our lecture rooms will likely be a spot for schooling, not indoctrination.”

Reid, nonetheless, smeared DeSantis as a racist for his administration’s actions. “I’m not saying Ron DeSantis is racist, however to cite [former Tallahassee Mayor] Andrew Gillum, I believe the racists would possibly assume he’s racist.”

She added that DeSantis desires solely completely satisfied historical past taught in faculties, “the historical past of slavery as completely satisfied slaves, good slave masters.”

Plus, watch as she twists the opposite AP historical past courses taught in Florida as she bashes the “book-banning wannabe president.”

From Thursday’s The ReidOut on MSNBC:

Pleasure Reid: The [Stop Woke Act] is geared toward eradicating the instructing of historical past, gender id, and sexual orientation in favor of curriculum that facilities and lionizes individuals who seem like Ron DeSantis. Simply check out what AP programs are deemed educationally invaluable within the state of Florida per the book-banning wannabe president. European historical past, after all. Together with programs on the historical past and language of Italy, the place DeSantis’s household hails from, Germany, and Japan, which occurred to be the Axis international locations the U.S. fought throughout World Battle II. Now, whether or not Ron would think about fascist Italy to have been a nasty man in that conflict, properly, that’s up for debate. …

So, what DeSantis is actually saying is that the one invaluable Superior Placement class for a Florida scholar are courses which are about Europe or the opposite Axis international locations. That’s it. African-American research just isn’t deemed invaluable, and it’s not that he’s saying you may’t train black historical past, however right here’s the proof. It’s the way you train black historical past that he’s bought an issue with.

DeSantis, when he was a highschool historical past trainer — that is the quote from certainly one of his former college students. He was a highschool historical past trainer at a personal faculty in Georgia. ‘Mr. DeSantis was imply to me and hostile towards me,’ stated Miss Pompey, who graduated in 2003. ‘Not aggressively however passively as a result of I used to be black.’ She recalled DeSantis instructing, that is the vital half, Civil Battle historical past in a approach that sounded to her like an try to justify slavery. So, after I add that to the actual fact he’s going after the Nationwide Hockey League as a result of they dare to recruit nonblack folks, basically saying it’s possible you’ll recruit white folks and proceed to maintain a really white league white, however it’s possible you’ll not attempt to recruit minorities. You recognize, I’m not saying Ron DeSantis is racist, however to cite Andrew Gillum, I believe the racists would possibly assume he’s racist. …

It’s the Daughters of the American Revolution, the pro-Accomplice teams who insisted that we will solely train the historical past of slavery as completely satisfied slaves, good slave masters. If you happen to’re doing that, I promise you an AP class that taught that, that slavery was good, as a result of it appeared a minimum of per his former college students, Dr. [Steve] Gallon [member of the Miami-Dale school board] that he needed to show historical past of slavery as form of gallant slave house owners who had been form to their completely satisfied slaves.

He’s cool with that. And if the AP course stated that, he’d be high quality with it. I additionally assume that you just’ve seen the revelation of what that is actually about. A man named Stanley Kurtz claims he learn the story, that he learn the curriculum, and he stated, ‘The bigger hazard right here is that these programs, in the event that they’re permitted, will see the faculty board devise AP programs in girls’s research, gender research, transgender research, Latino research, environmental research, a full panoply of polarized research which have Balkanized and politicized greater schooling.’ Dr. Gallon, in your view, is that this an try to shut down the instructing of not simply black historical past however any historical past however the Hallmark card of white and European historical past?

Brent Baker, vp of analysis and publications for the Media Analysis Heart, explains our weekly choose: “Reid’s vitriol exhibits DeSantis have to be succeeding in making inroads to undercut establishments, such because the schooling institution, as automobiles for liberal indoctrination of scholars. So, DeSantis have to be discredited with over-the-top invective earlier than he features any traction in a presidential race. However Reid’s hatred towards him will solely elevate the admiration for him amongst conservatives and lots of unbiased voters.”

Score: FOUR out of FIVE SCREAMS.

■ January 16, 2023: Liberal Media Scream: In Chuck Todd’s ‘details,’ Sen. Ron Johnson sees bias

(Washington Examiner submit)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream raises an fascinating query in at this time’s partisan Washington. Why do Republicans discuss to liberal journalists in the event that they know that they’re going to be insulted?

That was the case Sunday on Chuck Todd’s Meet the Press when Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WY) appeared, figuring out he was holding the quick finish of the stick it doesn’t matter what he stated. Johnson even stated so: “That is fairly apparent to anyone watching this, is you don’t invite me on to interview me. You invite me on to argue with me.”

The host, after all, was having none of it. In between his favourite authority openings of “Look” and “So,” he bought the final insult in when he stated, “You may return in your partisan cable cocoon and speak about media bias all you need. I perceive it’s a part of your id.”

From Sunday’s Meet the Press:

CHUCK TODD: I’ll take it at your phrase that you just’re ethically bothered by Hunter Biden. I’m curious, although. You appear to have a sample.

SEN. RON JOHNSON (R-WI): Are you not? Are you not?

TODD: I’m a journalist. I’ve to deal in details. I deal in details, so senator, my query to you is, I’ve skepticism of each events. I sit right here with skepticism of lots of people’s work.

JOHNSON: So do I.

TODD: And I’m curious, are you — had been you in any respect involved — your Senate Democrats wish to examine Jared Kushner’s mortgage from the Qatari authorities when he was working within the authorities, negotiating many issues within the Center East? Are you not involved about that? I say that as a result of it appears to me if you happen to’re involved about what Hunter Biden did, try to be equally outraged about what Jared Kushner did.

JOHNSON: I’m involved about getting the reality. I don’t goal people —

TODD: You don’t? You’re concentrating on Hunter Biden a number of occasions on this present, senator. You’re concentrating on a person.

JOHNSON: Chuck, you already know, a part of the issue, and that is fairly apparent to anyone watching that is, you don’t invite me on to interview me. You invite me on to argue with me. I’m simply attempting to put out the details that actually Sen. Grassley and I uncovered. They had been suppressed. They had been censored. They interfered within the 2020 election. Conservatives perceive that. Sadly, liberals within the media don’t. And that’s a part of the explanations our politics are infected is we should not have an unbiased media. We don’t. It’s unlucky. I’m all for a free press, and it must be extra unbiased.

TODD: Senator, look — go to partisan — Senator, look, we’re attempting to do points right here and details. Look, you may return in your partisan cable cocoon and speak about media bias all you need. I perceive it’s a part of your id.

Brent Baker, vp of analysis and publications for the Media Analysis Heart, explains our weekly choose: “Chuck Todd, in all his obnoxious glory. Kudos to Sen. Ron Johnson for taking up Todd’s apparent bias and hostility to the issues of conservatives, even when he’s apparent to his personal ‘cocoon.’ Pot meet kettle.”

Score: FIVE out of FIVE SCREAMS.

■ January 9, 2023: Liberal Media Scream: James Comer nails Chuck Todd’s biased views

(Washington Examiner submit)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream is the primary proof that there’s a new sheriff on the town, a Home GOP majority that’s desirous to level out the biased and infrequently hypocritical views within the media.

In our highlight is Rep. James Comer (R-KY), incoming chairman of the Home Committee on Oversight and Reform, invited on to Chuck Todd’s NBC Sunday present, Meet the Press. He confronted the sometimes biased questions and views of the host, akin to when Todd advised the GOP can be holding votes on laws it is aware of President Joe Biden gained’t signal, as if Democrats by no means held “present” votes.

Todd additionally sneered at Comer’s investigation agenda, suggesting it was simply political theater.

However as an alternative of taking it, the lawmaker pushed proper again, calling out the biased media.

When Todd dismissed Republican plans to carry votes on time period limits and a balanced finances as “present votes,” Comer countered, “Loads of occasions, as you already know, Chuck, it’s important to take payments by way of quite a few classes of Congress earlier than they lastly develop into regulation.”

And when Todd hit GOP plans to probe the Biden administration as “extra partisan than skilled,” Comer stated, “I believe the one those that see this as a partisan investigation are the media and the hardcore Democrats.” And for good measure, he added, “Are you kidding me!”

Two of the exchanges from Sunday’s Meet the Press on NBC:

CHUCK TODD: I‘m curious, these two belongings you point out, these are present votes. They’re not going to move. They don’t have any likelihood of passing. A few of them would possibly must be constitutional amendments, and you understand how arduous that course of is. What’s the purpose of passing a invoice that principally, you get to place a press launch out on, but it surely doesn’t get enacted?

REP. JAMES COMER: Loads of occasions, as you already know, Chuck, it’s important to take payments by way of quite a few classes of Congress earlier than they lastly develop into regulation.

TODD: Let me ask you this. You’re going to do a whole lot of oversight. You’re going to have a whole lot of subpoenas. Many individuals take a look at what you’re doing, and so they see that it appears to be like extra partisan than skilled. Inform me the way you’re going to attempt to departisanize an investigation? Or do you count on it to be partisan?

COMER: Effectively, with all due respect, Chuck, I disagree with that. I believe the one those that see this as a partisan investigation are the media and the hardcore Democrats. Look, on the similar second that the Democrats on the Methods and Means Committee launched Donald Trump’s taxes, they then moments later rotated and stated, “Comer’s investigation of the Biden household affect peddling is a revenge listening to.” I imply, are you kidding me?

Brent Baker, vp of analysis and publications for the Media Analysis Heart, explains our weekly choose: “Comer is off to a terrific begin, recognizing the information media are his enemy simply as a lot as Democrats. It was refreshing to listen to an elevated Republican chief tackle Todd for his a number of hypocrisies, instantly involved, now that Republicans are in cost within the Home, concerning the partisanship of an investigation and the futility of votes on two conservative agenda gadgets that can embarrass Democrats. As if Democrats have by no means had ‘present votes,’ to place Republicans in a nasty mild, which most journalists discovered admirable.”

Score: FIVE out of FIVE SCREAMS (CHEERS.)

■ January 2, 2023: Liberal Media Scream: MSNBC calls GOP the occasion of il Duce

(Washington Examiner submit)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options MSNBC doing its greatest to develop into the community of the crackpot Left, speaking itself into irrelevance for almost everybody else.

Not happy with its document of attacking Republicans and conservatives as MAGA crazies, the cable channel rolled out a number and visitor who dismissed the occasion as fascists. And never simply easy fascists akin to World Battle II-era Italian chief Benito Mussolini.

How about “neo-fascist,” “proto-fascist,” and “semi-fascist?” Now that’s bought to harm.

The name-calling got here Saturday when Mehdi Hasan hosted Yale College philosophy professor Jason Stanley on Velshi on MSNBC.

Stanley, who authored a guide titled How Fascism Works, warned, “I believe ‘semi-fascism,’ ‘fascism,’ ‘neo-fascism,’ these are correct descriptions. We have to drop discuss of populism, drop these deceptive descriptions that disguise what we’re really dealing with.”

From Saturday’s Velshi:

MEHDI HASAN: Jason, the GOP is again in energy once more, a minimum of within the Home of Representatives, which suggests there will likely be a good bit of normalizing of them once more by the media. In your view, is it truthful to explain the trendy GOP as ‘neo-fascist’ or ‘proto-fascist’ or, to cite Joe Biden on the MAGA motion, ‘semi-fascist?’

JASON STANLEY, Yale College: There’s actually throughout the fashionable GOP, because the scapegoating of LGBT residents demonstrates, a fascist motion rising. We — and, to speak about this as some form of European factor is a confusion since fascism is Jim Crow with a international accent. So we’ve a local, we’ve a number of native far-right extremist actions: Christian Nationalism, we’ve bought, form of, heritage of Jim Crow. We’ve bought an anti-democratic enterprise institution. And it is a construction, a grouping, that’s going to carry folks to vote for an authoritarian occasion. And that’s what we’ve, that’s what the trendy GOP is more and more wanting like — as Ruth [NYU history professor Ruth Ben-Ghiat] stated, an anti-democratic occasion. I believe ‘semi-fascism,’ ‘fascism,’ ‘neo-fascism,’ these are correct descriptions. We have to drop discuss of populism, drop these deceptive descriptions that disguise what we’re really dealing with.

Brent Baker, vp of analysis and publications for the Media Analysis Heart, explains our weekly choose: “Fairly the multiple-choice, a spread which says extra concerning the slim considering of MSNBC hosts and company attempting to discredit Republicans than it does about something to worry from Republicans. Hasan dreads ‘normalizing’ Republicans as a result of it’s lots simpler to demonize them than to tackle and critically handle views with which you disagree.”

Score: FOUR out of FIVE SCREAMS.

> Liberal Media Screams for 2021 and 2022

> For all of 2020.

> For all of 2019.

> For all of 2018.

> For July by way of December 2017.

> For January by way of June 2017.

> For July by way of December 2016.

> For January by way of June 2016.

> For July to December 2015.