[ad_1]
The PBS NewsHour, hypersensitive to threats to “gun security” measures (their phrases), sounded unpleasantly stunned on Thursday night’s version by a federal appeals court docket ruling permitting folks underneath home violence restraining orders to have weapons, primarily based on the Supreme Court docket’s Bruen resolution in June 2022.
NewsHour invited on a journalist specializing on what his group phrases the “gun violence disaster” to present his take. It’s a part of a PBS sample emphasizing what its journalists benignly time period “gun security” (i.e. laws and restrictions) and speaking non-journalistically of the “lethal epidemic” of gun violence (as if weapons are contagious) and the misnomer of “assault weapons,” all whereas downplaying the twond modification proper to bear arms as an antiquated provision.
NewsHour co-host Amna Nawaz went straight to ideology in her lead-up to the interview with Chip Brownlee, gun journalist from The Hint:
Nawaz: One of many nation’s most conservative appeals courts has struck down a federal regulation that banned folks underneath home violence restraining orders from proudly owning weapons. The choice, which solely applies within the fifth district of Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, is simply a part of the large authorized fallout from a U.S. Supreme Court docket ruling on the twond Modification final 12 months, and it may sign how courts will resolve on firearms circumstances for years to return. Becoming a member of me now could be Chip Brownlee, he’s a reporter with The Hint, a nonprofit information group that covers gun violence. Chip welcome to the NewsHour. Let’s simply begin with the fast influence. So does this imply anybody in Texas or Louisiana or Mississippi who has a home violence restraining order can now legally personal a gun?
….
Nawaz: So the explanation these legal guidelines have been in place within the first place we must always be aware, there’s a well-established connection between home violence and gun violence, proper? Inform us about that.
Brownlee: In all probability a few fourth of the homicides which can be executed with weapons in the USA are indirectly associated to home violence or household violence. About half of the ladies within the U.S. who’re shot and killed with a gun yearly are shot and killed in home violence incidents. We all know from the analysis that having a gun on this scenario raises the chance of a home violence homicide by about 400%….
Neither Nawaz nor her visitor had a lot sympathy for the “originalist” philosophy of the Structure, commiserating over the obvious ridiculousness of the Supreme Court docket’s 2nd Modification resolution.
Nawaz: I discovered this line actually placing, Chip, in making use of the brand new normal they are saying the regulation is quote, ‘an outlier that our ancestors would by no means have accepted.’ In order that they’re primarily saying what, as a result of home violence wasn’t a criminal offense within the 18th and nineteenth century then this regulation is unconstitutional?
Brownlee: “Just about, yeah….
NewsHour pushes gun-fear regularly. A small latest pattern: Co-host Geoff Bennett opened the January 23 present: “Good night. We start tonight with the lethal epidemic of gun violence in America — an issue with no letup in sight. In California, authorities are attempting to find out the motive behind this weekend’s capturing in Monterey park.”
On January 27, Washington Submit reporter Ruth Marcus urged gun violence was contagious: “Till we cease this proliferation of gun violence, which is a uniquely, disturbingly American phenomenon, whether or not it’s mass shootings or particular person shootings, we’re affected by an epidemic of gun violence.”
On February 7, Bennett used the meaningless, manufactured time period “assault weapon” to unfold concern of weapons: “And federal authorities foil an effort by racially-motivated extremists to make use of assault weapons to deliver down Baltimore’s electrical grid.”
A partial transcript is beneath, click on “Broaden” to learn:
PBS NewsHour
February 9, 2023
7:44:25 p.m. Japanese
Co-host Amna Nawaz: One of many nation’s most conservative appeals courts has struck down a federal regulation that banned folks underneath home violence restraining orders from proudly owning weapons. The choice, which solely applies within the fifth district of Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, is simply a part of the large authorized fallout from a U.S. Supreme Court docket ruling on the twond Modification final 12 months, and it may sign how courts will resolve on firearms circumstances for years to return. Becoming a member of me now could be Chip Brownlee, he’s a reporter with The Hint, a nonprofit information group that covers gun violence. Chip welcome to the NewsHour. Let’s simply begin with the fast influence. So does this imply anybody in Texas or Louisiana or Mississippi who has a home violence restraining order can now legally personal a gun?
….
Nawaz: So the explanation these legal guidelines have been in place within the first place we must always be aware, there’s a well-established connection between home violence and gun violence, proper? Inform us about that.
Chip Brownlee, The Hint: In all probability a few fourth of the homicides which can be executed with weapons in the USA are indirectly associated to home violence or household violence. About half of the ladies within the U.S. who’re shot and killed with a gun yearly are shot and killed in home violence incidents. We all know from the analysis that having a gun on this scenario raises the chance of a home violence homicide by about 400%. So these legal guidelines, these have been tried to form of forestall these by having in place a prohibition on an individual having a gun in the event that they’re underneath these restraining orders. As a result of you’ll be able to think about if anyone goes to the size to get a restraining order they really feel like they’re underneath an emergency scenario, that they want safety, and people are in all probability probably the most harmful conditions that anyone will be in.
….
Nawaz: I discovered this line actually placing, Chip, in making use of the brand new normal they are saying the regulation is quote, ‘an outlier that our ancestors would by no means have accepted.’ In order that they’re primarily saying what, as a result of home violence wasn’t a criminal offense within the 18th and nineteenth century then this regulation is unconstitutional?
Brownlee: Just about, yeah….
[ad_2]