With the media hyper-focused on the homicide trial of former South Carolina District Lawyer Alex Murdaugh (as if there wasn’t an ongoing ecological catastrophe in East Palestine, Ohio), after all, the cackling coven of ABC’s The View needed to weigh in. And together with her wealth of intelligence, fake conservative Ana Navarro joked that she initially thought the trial was in opposition to Fox Company boss Rupert Murdoch for the reason that final names are pronounced equally.

Navarro let it’s recognized that she was bored by the trial and didn’t care, however at one level admitted she “acquired actually enthusiastic” as a result of she initially thought the top of Fox Information was on trial for “misinformation.”

“Like, at first I acquired actually passionate about it as a result of I believed ‘Ah, the Murdoch trial? You imply, it’s Rupert Murdoch for spreading misinformation over at Fox Information?’ However no! It is this yahoo,” she huffed.

She additionally urged that Murdaugh wasn’t behind bars as a result of he was white. “I’m not in any respect. It does piss me off although as a result of this man has stolen hundreds of thousands and hundreds of thousands –  A black or Latino steals a pack of cigarettes and so they’re in jail for years,” she proclaimed.

She supplied no proof of such circumstances.

The assertion that race was what saved Murdaugh out of jail, and never his household’s perverse authorized dynasty within the state, was shared by racist Sunny Hostin. “So, when you could have this wealthy rich white man dynasty member testifying and pondering that he may get off, I believe we need to know as armchair detectives does the system actually work?” she questioned.

Hostin additionally ridiculously in contrast the Murdaugh homicide trial to the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse. “It did call to mind Kyle Rittenhouse who testified on his personal behalf and acquired off,” she scoffed. “And so, I’m wondering – My solely query is after testifying: does he get off?”

Rittenhouse took the stand to clarify what occurred throughout his self-defense incident when three violent leftist rioters assaulted him, considered one of which threatened him earlier within the night time and tried to take his rifle. A jury of his friends heard all of the proof and exonerated him.

Navarro and Hostin did get enthusiastic about the opportunity of former President Trump being dragged into court docket:

NAVARRO: Pay attention, honey, I promise you this: if Donald Trump goes on trial I am going to watch each single minute and put it on replay!

HOSTIN: I believe we’re all going to look at that!

In fact, this drew a raucous response from the viewers.

Ana Navarro’s ridiculousness was made attainable due to profitable sponsorships from CarFax and Swiffer. Their contact data is linked.

The transcript was under, click on “increase” to learn:

ABC’s The View
February 24, 2023
11:06:05 a.m. Jap

(…)

ANA NAVARRO: I watched this – Like, at first I acquired actually passionate about it as a result of I believed “Ah, the Murdoch trial? You imply, it’s Rupert Murdoch for spreading misinformation over at Fox Information?” However no! It is this yahoo.

I’m not in any respect. It does piss me off although as a result of this man has stolen hundreds of thousands and hundreds of thousands –  

SUNNY HOSTIN: From his shoppers, truly additionally.

NAVARRO: A black or Latino steals a pack of cigarettes and so they’re in jail for years.

ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: Yeah, and he defrauded lots of black and brown individuals.

HOSTIN: I loved it very a lot. I used to be kind of watching it like this. And that is primarily as a result of I believe that it is extremely uncommon for this kind of dynasty to exist, of attorneys. Proper? It is a dynasty of attorneys. They know the regulation higher than everybody else. They fastened the sport.

However he testified and very first thing you study in prison regulation isn’t testify because the defendant. As a result of prosecutors practice to do it. I imply, I’ve solely had the pleasure of cross inspecting possibly three defendants and you reside for it. He will get up there and says – he admits to being a liar. So, like, are you telling the reality now or have been you telling the reality then? It is traditional, one thing that you’d see on tv. He admits to being addicted. He additionally used the time period, “I’d by no means have deliberately executed something.” Nicely, possibly you probably did it once you have been excessive on no matter opioids you used to take.

So, he actually harmed himself, I believe, in his testimony. So, when you could have this wealthy rich white man dynasty member testifying and pondering that he may get off, I believe we need to know as armchair detectives does the system actually work? It did call to mind Kyle Rittenhouse who testified on his personal behalf and acquired off. And so, I’m wondering – My solely query is after testifying: does he get off?

(…)

11:08:33 a.m. Jap

NAVARRO: Pay attention, honey, I promise you this: if Donald Trump goes on trial I am going to watch each single minute and put it on replay!

[Applause and laughter]

HOSTIN: I believe we’re all going to look at that!

(…)