[ad_1]
The Adelaide Crows look set to attraction the AFL tribunal’s determination to uphold a three-match ban handed to ahead Shane McAdam for his brutal hit on GWS‘s Jacob Wehr.
McAdam’s bump on Wehr was one in all three thrust into the highlight in spherical one, together with Swans veteran Lance Franklin‘s on the Gold Coast‘s Sam Collins, and Demons firebrand Kysaiah Pickett’s on Bailey Smith.
The Swans had earlier accepted Franklin’s one match ban, as did the Dees for Pickett’s two-game ban. McAdam was despatched straight to the tribunal.
READ MORE: ‘Particular’ teenager’s epic response to vile abuse
READ MORE: ‘I surrender’: Confusion rocks AFL after costs laid
READ MORE: Dolphins star dominated out in ‘extremely poor’ name
Franklin’s bump Collins was categorized as excessive contact and careless contact, however solely a medium impression which resulted within the smaller penalty.
Pickett was hit with a careless conduct, excessive impression and excessive contact cost.
The Crows used each Franklin’s and Pickett’s bumps as examples, however apparently, the jury dismissed the Pickett instance, deeming it to be a extra “glancing impression” – dispute Pickett additionally launching himself into Smith.
In addition they produced Patrick Dangerfield’s bump on Jake Kelly in 2021 and Paddy Ryder’s on Hawthorn’s Will Day early final season as additional proof.
The tribunal discovered though Wehr in some way escaped damage, the potential for severe damage was excessive.
Historically, the AFL tribunal didn’t classify hits notably severely – as brutal as they could in any other case be – if the participant on the receiving finish was not injured.
McAdam’s advocate Tom Duggan stated provided that, the Crows had been “stunned” in regards to the classification.
“The truth is that on this case…there was no damage in any respect,” Duggan stated.
“It’s absolutely a fabric undeniable fact that there was no damage when contemplating whether or not the impression was extreme.”
Crows star banned for ugly hit
Tribunal chairman Jeff Gleeson stated the hit amounted to “tough conduct below the broad definition”.
“It was careless. McAdam selected to bump at cheap velocity. Was it excessive contact? We discover that it was.
“Was it no less than low precise impression to the top? We discover that it was. The impression was higher than that. It was not negligible.
“Right here the potential for damage and severe damage was very excessive. We regard it as extreme impression.”
For a each day dose of the most effective of the breaking information and unique content material from Broad World of Sports activities, subscribe to our e-newsletter by clicking right here!
The most important controversies in AFL historical past
[ad_2]