The cackling coven of ABC’s The View was outraged on Wednesday after information broke that Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) gave Fox Information host Tucker Carlson all 44,000 hours of footage from January 6. The gaggling gals have been off the rails from the get-go with accusations that Carlson was a safety danger who would reveal “evacuation factors,” “secure rooms,” and safety digital camera places which might find yourself enabling one other January 6 or 9/11.

“So, precisely how harmful is it to let Tucker Carlson reset the narrative on January 6?” Pleasure Behar requested the hysterical fake conservative, Alyssa Farah Griffin.

With out proof, Farah Griffin proclaimed that Carlson’s possession of the footage “raises enormous security and safety issues for the Capitol.” She then proceeded to rattle off all of the completely different sorts of safety measures we’d supposedly expose:

So, I labored within the Capitol for a few years. There are underground evacuation factors, there are secure rooms. We even have rooms to guard for like bio/chemical assaults the place you may go and safely be housed. This can even reveal the place video cameras are stationed within the Capitol.

She then tried to make an Evel Knievel-style leap and argue that Carlson having the footage was in some way anti-police and would allow 9/11 2.0:

So, as a Republican, we all the time say we again the blue. Nicely, you simply uncovered all the Capitol and undermined the Capitol Police and their security precautions for one thing like January 6 have been it ever to occur once more or one thing like 9/11 the place the Capitol was focused.

“It is so, so harmful,” she opined.

The bloviating continued with Pleasure Behar questioning if McCarthy or Carlson was breaking the regulation by handing over or receiving the footage. Racist Sunny Hostin needed to let her down straightforward:

BEHAR: Is not this in opposition to the regulation to do one thing like that? Why isn’t it in opposition to the regulation?

SUNNY HOSTIN: It isn’t. I spent the morning researching.

Echoing Farah Griffin, Hostin warned that Carlson having the footage was “so harmful.” “It is so divisive for our nation. However it’s most harmful, I feel, for the safety of our nation,” she lamented.

Farah Griffin’s ridiculous options about safety threats have been one thing all the solid latched on to. “The most important factor here’s what Alyssa stated earlier than. The safety dangers, exposing the within of the White Home,” Sara Haines declared.

Insisting that Carlson had “nefarious intentions,” Haines additionally pushed the long-debunked accusation that Republican members of Congress had helped rioters scout the Capitol beforehand:

However they proved that they have been giving excursions – Congress individuals have been giving excursions earlier than to indicate individuals precisely what we simply – what was simply now handed over to somebody. And the place there might be nothing good coming from it, they’ve investigated we’ve accomplished the whole lot we have to do. It isn’t solely not going so as to add good, it really solely has dangerous intentions. It is – Nefarious intentions drive this request.

The solid of The View knew completely properly these accusations have been busted final yr. Again in June 2022, they cried foul when the Capitol Police exonerated Congressman Barry Loudermilk (R-GA). “I do not perceive why they did launch an announcement that stated, ‘properly, we have investigated this and there is nothing to see right here.’ That half does really concern me,” Hostin whined on the time.

As they have been nearing the tip of the Wednesday phase, the lunacy swelled as Haines and Farah Griffin teamed as much as seemingly counsel McCarthy had eliminated the metallic detectors exterior the Home chamber to permit the Freedom Caucus to shoot different members of Congress:

HAINES: Pelosi had added metallic detectors as a result of we additionally know there have been Congress individuals preventing whether or not you must be capable of carry within the Capitol —

FARAH GRIFFIN: And by the way in which, we’ve seen the Capitol ground descend into assaults lately.

HAINES: Proper! We’ve after you’ve seen that, one of many first issues he did as speaker was take away these metallic detectors. These seem to be ridiculous strikes.

Lastly, Hostin lamented that the Home Ethics Committee wasn’t doing something to cease McCarthy. “Nicely, as a result of she oversees it although is the factor,” Farah Griffin complained, regardless of the very fact Hostin admitted earlier that nothing unlawful was occurring.

The View’s unhinged conspiracy theories have been made doable due to profitable sponsorships from Vicks and Common Mills. Their contact info is linked.

The transcript is beneath, click on “increase” to learn:

ABC’s The View
February 22, 2023
11:04:15 a.m. Jap

(…)

JOY BEHAR: So, precisely how harmful is it to let Tucker Carlson reset the narrative on January 6?

ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: I feel it’s two fold. So, this raises enormous security and safety issues for the Capitol.

So, I labored within the Capitol for a few years. There are underground evacuation factors, there are secure rooms. We even have rooms to guard for like bio/chemical assaults the place you may go and safely be housed. This can even reveal the place video cameras are stationed within the Capitol.

So, as a Republican, we all the time say we again the blue. Nicely, you simply uncovered all the Capitol and undermined the Capitol Police and their security precautions for one thing like January 6 the place it ever to occur once more or one thing like 9/11 the place the Capitol was focused.

However secondarily, it permits Tucker Carlson to invent his personal narrative about what occurred. 44 hours of footage; you may provide you with all types of various issues to feed your narrative and his viewers simply continues to get lies and lies about what occurred that day. It is so, so harmful.

BEHAR: Is not this in opposition to the regulation to do one thing like that? Why isn’t it in opposition to the regulation?

SUNNY HOSTIN: It isn’t. I spent the morning researching. As a result of usually, you might have a Freedom of Data Act request that information retailers, let’s say ask Capitol Police for is. So, is it unlawful simply to provide it to 1 particular person? The Capitol Police isn’t — the FOIA – the Freedom of Data Act does not apply to them. And so, if somebody in Congress, like a frontrunner in congress, asks the Capitol Police for this info, 44,000 hours of footage, they need to comply.

And so, that’s what is frightening right here.

BEHAR: However why did not he give it to The New York Occasions and to different newspapers?

HOSTIN: Nicely, I feel – Nicely, I do not need to guess. However , he needed to make plenty of concessions to develop into speaker. Proper? And possibly one of many concessions that he needed to give Marjorie Taylor Greene or one in every of his supporters was give Tucker Carlson this. We all know how highly effective Tucker Carlson has develop into inside the Republican Get together. It is odd {that a} faux information anchor could be that particular person.

(…)

It is so harmful. It is so divisive for our nation. However it’s most harmful, I feel, for the safety of our nation.

(…)

11:07:56 a.m. Jap

SARA HAINES: The most important factor here’s what Alyssa stated earlier than. The safety dangers, exposing the within of the White Home. You are sharing movies with individuals –

BEHAR: Folks have been killed – individuals died on January 6.

HOSTIN: An officer.

HAINES: They have been giving excursions—

BEHAR: They’re going to say it was a tourism day.

HAINES: However they proved that they have been giving excursions – Congress individuals have been giving excursions earlier than to indicate individuals precisely what we simply – what was simply now handed over to somebody. And the place there might be nothing good coming from it, they’ve investigated we’ve accomplished the whole lot we have to do. It isn’t solely not going so as to add good, it really solely has dangerous intentions. It is – Nefarious intentions drive this request.

(…)

11:09:02 a.m. Jap

HAINES: Pelosi had added metallic detectors as a result of we additionally know there have been Congress individuals preventing whether or not you must be capable of carry within the Capitol —

FARAH GRIFFIN: And by the way in which, we’ve seen the Capitol ground descend into assaults lately.

HAINES: Proper! We’ve after you’ve seen that, one of many first issues he did as speaker was take away these metallic detectors. These seem to be ridiculous strikes.

HOSTIN: Once more, which may be one thing that he needed to give these folks that need to carry weapons inside the sacred halls of Congress. However I’ll say this, why does not the Home Ethics Committee take a look at one thing like that?

FARAH GRIFFIN: Nicely, as a result of she oversees it although is the factor.

(…)