Western leaders used a gathering of worldwide elites in Munich to make the case that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine posed a menace not simply to Europe however to the entire world. There was little proof their message obtained by means of.

Talking on the Munich Safety Convention, a clutch of senior US and European officers sought to persuade the remainder of the world of the menace posed to them by President Vladimir Putin’s invasion — and present them that blame for increased international meals and vitality costs lay with Moscow.

US vice-president Kamala Harris mentioned “no nation is secure” in a world the place “one nation can violate the sovereignty and territorial integrity of one other”.

French president Emmanuel Macron mentioned the “neocolonial, imperialist” Russian invasion was not “solely a European battle”. German chancellor Olaf Scholz mentioned it will be all people’s downside if “the regulation of the strongest prevailed in worldwide relations”.

But their makes an attempt to painting the battle in common phrases met some acquainted retorts.

Brazilian overseas minister Mauro Vieira mentioned that the battle was a “very unhappy state of affairs” and pressured his authorities “deplored” invasion.

However, in a message that jarred with the stance of western attendees calling for resolve to battle a protracted battle in Ukraine, Vieira added: “It’s been one 12 months now. We now have to attempt to construct the opportunity of an answer. We can not maintain speaking solely of battle.”

Organisers of the annual gathering within the Bavarian metropolis had been proud that this 12 months’s occasion had a document variety of members from international locations in what they termed the worldwide south, even because it remained dominated by officers from Europe and the US.

There was palpable frustration amongst some leaders from African and South American nations that the battle in Ukraine, which on Friday will enter its second 12 months, was consuming the time, cash and a focus of the west on the expense of different urgent issues.

Francia Márquez, the vice-president of Colombia, mentioned that her nation wished Europe’s assistance on tackling the fallout from local weather change and defending the Amazon rainforest. “We don’t need to go on discussing who would be the winner or the loser of a battle,” she mentioned. “We’re all losers and, in the long run, it’s humankind that loses every little thing.”

Namibian prime minister Saara Kuugongelwa-Amadhila was requested why her nation had — together with China, India and 32 different nations — abstained from a UN decision in October that noticed 143 international locations declare the Russian annexation of a number of Ukrainian areas as unlawful.

She mentioned that Namibia was targeted on “resolving the issue, not on shifting blame”. She added: “The underside line is that cash used to purchase weapons could be higher used to advertise improvement in Ukraine, in Africa, in Asia, within the EU itself the place many individuals are going through hardships.”

Western officers mentioned bilateral conferences with leaders of the worldwide south on the convention sidelines revealed a a lot larger preoccupation with points similar to inflation, debt, increased vitality costs and meals safety than with the battle in Ukraine. There was additionally a lingering resentment, they mentioned, over the west’s disappointing document on sharing coronavirus vaccines and compensating them for the harm attributable to local weather change.

EU overseas coverage chief Josep Borrell, in the meantime, acknowledged the west’s personal problematic previous, citing European colonialism in Africa and western help for dictatorships in Latin America in a speech on Sunday. “Folks have reminiscence and folks have emotions,” he mentioned. “We now have to have interaction extra, exhibiting that we’re defending common values.”

Consolation Ero, president of the battle prevention organisation Disaster Group, welcomed what she mentioned was the “important effort” by the west to reply to criticism that it was placing different international locations by means of “a loyalty check” on Ukraine and failing to hearken to their considerations. “Speaking is vital. Listening is vital,” she mentioned. “The important thing will probably be how does that translate into precise coverage engagement and sensible outcomes.”

Ero added that it was vital to not lump international locations collectively, stating that, whereas South Africa had abstained from final 12 months’s UN vote on the Russian annexations, Ghana and Nigeria had been amongst a string of African nations that voted in favour of it.

China’s stance on the battle loomed massive over the Munich gathering together with tensions between Beijing and Washington. Amrita Narlikar, president and professor on the Hamburg-based German Institute for World and Space Research, mentioned that European and American officers wanted to do higher in countering what she known as China’s “very intelligent” framing of itself as part of the worldwide south, the place it promotes itself as a associate to assist nations safeguard their sovereignty and increase improvement.

Narlikar mentioned a peace plan for the Ukraine battle that Beijing had promised to publish within the coming days — drawing scepticism from European and US officers — would most likely goal not simply the west. “Equally importantly, the worldwide south could be anticipated to be the viewers,” she mentioned.

“If China had been to current its imaginative and prescient as one among a peace dialogue between Russia and Ukraine, and emphasise the worldwide financial prices of a long-drawn battle, this is able to take pleasure in appreciable help in massive components of the worldwide south.

“The west must get its act collectively and construct extra inclusive and profitable narratives,” she added.