Eberhard isn’t a giant believer in autonomous driving—and he worries about Musk’s deal with it. In an interview printed by Insider right this moment, he prompt it may very well be harmful.

On Wednesday, the Nationwide Freeway Site visitors Security Administration introduced that Tesla will recall greater than 360,000 automobiles geared up with its Full Self-Driving (FSD) beta software program due to obvious crash dangers. (Musk takes subject with the phrase “recall” as a result of the required fixes shall be finished by way of an over-the-air software program replace as a substitute of in service facilities.)

Eberhard famous of Tesla’s early days, “all this FSD autonomous, autopilot crap—none of that existed once I was there. We had been nonetheless busy attempting to make the automotive work and we by no means thought of that in any respect. That got here later. That requires a a lot, a lot greater finances than we had.”

Musk has prioritized it. Final summer time, in an interview with the YouTube channel “Tesla House owners Silicon Valley,” he stated that attaining self-driving expertise is the “distinction between Tesla being price some huge cash or price principally zero.” 

Musk stated FSD mode was key to creating Teslas compelling sufficient that the carmaker might problem entrenched automakers.

Eberhard has totally different ideas. “In my view, we have to get out of the behavior of interested by all of this autonomous stuff as being linked to EVs,” he instructed Insider. He stated he appreciates “safety-oriented techniques” just like the driver-assist options that present Teslas include.

It’s the autonomous driving that bothers him. The FSD characteristic requires drivers to observe it, but it surely permits Teslas to routinely park, enter highways, change lanes, and cease at visitors lights.

“I feel the expertise is approach too immature to be laying on the highway,” Eberhard stated. “I imply, that is my cautious nature, however I might have had a very onerous time releasing software program that’s as buggy as that onto the roads.”

Eberhard isn’t alone. Final weekend, tech CEO Dan O’Dowd spent practically $600,000 on a Tremendous Bowl advert warning Individuals about Tesla’s FSD characteristic. He tweeted, “I’m attempting to take away the worst, most incompetently designed, developed, and examined automotive product in the marketplace.” 

Tesla threatened O’Dowd and his group the Daybreak Venture with authorized motion final August after they launched a viral video that confirmed a Tesla purportedly in FSD mode hitting a child-sized model. In a cease-and-desist letter to O’Dowd, Tesla known as the Daybreak Venture’s exams “critically misleading and sure fraudulent.”

Tesla has confronted lawsuits and regulatory scrutiny over its autonomous driving characteristic. And final month, experiences emerged {that a} 2016 video demo about Tesla’s FSD mode had been, in line with testimony from an organization engineer, staged.

Fortune reached out to Tesla however didn’t obtain a right away response.

Eberhard stated that, in his thoughts, considering of a automotive as a software program platform is a mistake.

“I’ve an iPhone, and each time I get a software program replace there’s bugs in there,” he instructed Insider. “These bugs imply, for instance, that often my news-feed app crashes. That’s not a giant deal, as a result of it’s simply an annoyance on iPhone. However that type of a bug reveals up within the software program that controls, for instance, my brakes or the steering, it might kill you.”

Discover ways to navigate and strengthen belief in your small business with The Belief Issue, a weekly publication inspecting what leaders have to succeed. Enroll right here.